How we choose topics
Topics are selected based on genuine reader search demand and whether we can add real, specific value beyond what's already well-covered — not to chase volume for its own sake.
Research and sourcing standards
Recommendations and rules explainers are cross-checked against official rulebooks, publisher FAQs/errata, and established hobby-community references before publishing. We link to sources where a specific claim benefits from one.
Factual review
Every article goes through a factual accuracy pass before it's published. If a rule or recommendation is genuinely debated within the hobby community, we say so rather than presenting one interpretation as the only correct one.
Corrections and updates
When we get something wrong — including an outdated rules interpretation after an official errata — we fix it and note that the article was updated.
AI-assisted workflow — disclosed, not hidden
Content on this site is produced with AI assistance as part of the drafting process, under human review before publishing. We're stating this plainly rather than presenting AI-assisted content as if it were entirely unassisted human writing.
What we don't claim
We never claim first-hand playtesting we haven't actually done — if an article describes a specific play session or comparison, that means it was actually played, not simulated.
Advertising independence
Editorial decisions — what to write about and what to recommend — are made independently of any advertising relationship. Advertising, where it exists, is clearly distinguishable from editorial content.
Affiliate disclosure
This site does not currently use affiliate links. If that changes, affiliate relationships will be clearly disclosed on any page where they appear, in line with FTC guidance — this section establishes that commitment in advance, not after the fact.